Wednesday September 06, 2006

Carlene's Opinions

It doesn't seem that the developer can go for a plat note change before the broward county commissioners without the homeowners as joinders.

The city is not the only approval needed

It appeared the City approved the PUD to enable the developer to sell homes based on the premise of that PUD
It appears that Grand Palms is a fully Built PUD
I believe the homeowners were sold a lifestyle when purchasing into grand palms
that promised amenities.

It appears that the city went against its own zoning code ordinance 155 requirements that govern our PUD without any regard for the rights of the homeowners their citizens

Why did the board of directors have to do anything?

It appears that some board members so insistent on helping the developer attempt to take our rights away.

It appears that the developer has not agreed to anything that secures the rights of the homeowners

 

 

Concerned Homeowners Of Grand Palms, Inc

Protecting The Rights Of Grand Palms Homeowners

(www.CHofGP.com)

IMPORTANT NEW ITEMS
Click Here

Click Here To Contribute To Our
Fundraising Efforts

In June of 1987 the Hollywood Lakes Country Club, Inc. asked permission of the City of Pembroke Pines to build “a Community of Paramount quality…” stating; “that it will offer a private planned community with 27 holes of golf, 16 tennis courts, and a hotel resort, offering all the amenities…” 

Possibly to induce purchasers for Hollywood Lakes Country Club, Inc. or for the protection of said purchasers, the City of Pembroke Pines approved the PUD in October of 1987 guaranteeing to the purchasers a community with amenities with specific requirements of open spaces maintained to the highest standards. 

The City of Pembroke Pines appeared to protect purchasers in their Zoning Code 155 delineating the homeowners and requiring a PUD development to “exhibit and maintain a total open space requirement at least equal to 35% of the gross area of the PUD…” “and intended for the use or enjoyment of occupants of the planned unit developments.” “and improvements as are necessary and appropriate for the benefit and enjoyment of occupants.” The original PUD outlined the objectives and goals of the PUD.

The developer is seeking a major change in use. The PUD development previously approved by the city included open space and recreation areas such as a Tennis Parcel as outlined in the original Master Land Use Plan. The current PUD outlines the amount of land for development and specifies the amount of land for the open space requirement.

The proposed amendment allows the developer to build transient units and retail shops, contrary to the intentions of the existing PUD and taking away the requirements of the PUD that protected the rights of the residents of Grand Palms who are Landowners in the PUD.

Unfortunately, most of the residents do not realize what is really happening in our community. It appears as though people have tried to convince all  that the developer has the right to everything and the homeowners have no rights at all. I do not believe this is the case, I believe
we do have rights!

It appears as though some of the current board of directors, for reasons best known to themselves, have decided that negotiating a deal in the best interest of the homeowners is not on their agenda. They might have even gone against advise of counsel and met with the developer without representation forgoing items that even the first agreement secured to us. Items such as; fitness facility & spa, golf course, tennis courts, our entrance, our open space just to name a few.

It’s time we take back our community and stand up for what is rightfully ours and protect the best interest of the homeowners. We have formed a corporation and encourage the involvement of anyone who is interested in protecting our community and our
RIGHTS.
We need each and every one of you!


Together we can make a difference and protect not only our property interest but our quality of life in Grand Palms. Remember the the new opening of an entrance to Grand Palms leads to nowhere.  This cannot possibly be an answer to the traffic situation.

At the last hearing one of the commissioners asked the developer if the golf course would be open to only hotel guests or open to the public. The answer was that they could not guarantee that the golf course would remain open to anyone outside of hotel guests. The golf course is just one of the amenities we might lose.

To get involved please contact;
(305) 899-9467 ext. 101, or email; chofgp@gmail.com We look forward to hearing from all of whom want to join the hundreds of homeowners who will not sit back while others attempt to take their RIGHTS away.

With warmest thanks,
Carlene A. Tiedemann
http://www.CHofGP.com 

Join Our Mailing List

The information provided in this web site represents the personal opinions and investigation of Carlene A. Tiedemann

Copyright CHofGP.com 2006